James Keck


Picture of James KeckHector F. DeLuca Biochemical Sciences Building
Room 6214A
440 Henry Mall
Madison WI 53706
Phone: (608) 263-1815
Email: jlkeck@wisc.edu
Overview · Publications · Lab Website


B.S. 1992, University of Massachusetts
Ph.D. 1997, University of California-Berkeley (S. Marqusee)
Postdoctoral, 1997-98, Harvard University (J. Wang)
Postdoctoral, 1999-01, University of California-Berkeley (J. Berger)

Areas of Study

Biomolecular Folding & Interactions
Chemical Biology
DNA Metabolism & Genome Maintenance
Molecular Medicine
Quantitative Biology
Structural Biology

Research Overview

Research in the Keck lab examines the structural mechanisms that drive DNA replication, replication restart, recombination, and repair reactions.  Successful execution of these pathways is essential in all cells, and defects in the proteins that facilitate genome maintenance reactions lead to genome instability, cell death, and disease.  Our studies combine structural approaches with biochemical and cell biological methods to answer fundamental structure-function questions in genome biology.


Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins.  Bacterial single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) play essential protective and organizational roles in genome biology.  In their protective functions, SSBs bind and sequester ssDNA intermediates that are formed during genome maintenance reactions.  As organizational centers, SSB/ssDNA complexes form dynamic protein-docking “hubs” at which over a dozen different DNA replication, recombination, and repair enzymes gain access to genomic substrates through direct interactions with SSB.  This clustering of enzymes is thought to help integrate cellular genome maintenance reactions by facilitating the exchange of ssDNA substrates between DNA replication, recombination, and repair pathways.  In all cases examined to date, the last ~6 residues of SSB’s flexible C-terminus (SSB-Ct) form its protein docking site.  Eukaryotic SSBs also interact with a diverse array of genome maintenance proteins but, since they lack the SSB-Ct element found in bacterial SSBs, they do so through distinct mechanisms.

SSB as an organizational hub for bacterial genome maintenance

We have mapped the SSB-Ct binding sites on several genome maintenance proteins.  The examples we have focused on include bacterial proteins involved in DNA replication (chi subunit from the replicative DNA polymerase), recombination (RecQ DNA helicase), and repair (Exonuclease I and Uracil DNA glycosylase). Binding to SSB often stimulates enzyme activity through recruitment of the protein partner to its SSB/DNA substrate.  In cells, these interactions are essential for the proper localization and functions of SSB-associated proteins.

Similar electrostatic surfaces are used to bind the SSB-Ct

Future work aims to establish the full extent of cellular SSB interaction networks though protein interaction studies.  We plan to examine how multiple SSB-binding proteins might function cooperatively on SSB/ssDNA substrates and to determine the mechanisms that regulate assembly of SSB-interacting proteins on SSB/ssDNA complexes in cells.  The essential nature of bacterial SSB/protein interactions also makes the complexes attractive targets for the development of novel antibacterial therapeutics.


Mechanisms of DNA replication restart. Nearly all replication complexes (replisomes) formed at bacterial replication origins are thought to stall during the course of DNA replication.  This stalling may occur at sites of DNA damage and can lead to dramatic rearrangement of the replication fork DNA and disassembly of the replisome.  Reassembly of the DNA replication machinery on abandoned replication forks is therefore often required for complete DNA replication.  “DNA replication restart” is mediated several proteins (PriA, PriB, PriC, and DnaT in E. coli) that function in a coordinated manner to reload the replisome.  Currently, little is known about the structural mechanisms that support this essential cellular function.

We have developed a model based on work from our group and others that explains the linkage between abandoned replication fork recognition and replisome reloading.  In this model, PriA acts as a first-responder protein, binding directly to the abandoned replication fork DNA.  Subsequent stepwise assembly of PriB and DnaT or PriC onto the PriA/DNA complex creates a platform for recruiting the replisome on the replication fork.  As a step toward understanding the structure of the primosome, we have determined the structures of PriA and PriB and have initiated structural efforts on the remaining replication restart proteins. Our future work will focus on understanding the critical steps in formation of the fully assembled primosome through crystallographic and other structural approaches, along with biochemical and genetic studies.



Coordination of human DNA repair complexes. Eukaryotic cells have an astonishing number of DNA repair pathways that are regulated and coordinated, at least in part, by dynamic physical interactions.  We have recently begun a study of a key protein interaction interface that links the Fanconi Anemia Core Complex and Bloom Dissolvasome, two DNA repair complexes.  Our lab has determined the high-resolution crystal structure of the minimal protein interface that links these complexes, which is comprised of a short peptide from the FANCM protein from the Fanconi Anemia Core Complex binding to the RMI heterodimer from the Bloom Dissolvasome.  Using our structure as a guide, we have shown that mutations that block interaction between these complexes induces genomic instability in cells – a hallmark of nearly all cancers.  We are continuing to investigate this and other repair interfaces as examples of regulation by dynamic protein assembly and as potential chemotherapeutic targets.

Structural studies of the RMI1/RMI2/FANCM interface